19 September 2009

ISRAEL & US WAR PLANS MOVE FORWARD


While people are none the wiser………….

America and Israel plot to attack Iran with Russian backing. I will outline their plans in this post. It begins today with a “nefarious report” that is “unverified” supposedly given by some “mysterious un-named person” who supposedly “leaked” a “secret” section of a report on Iran’s nuclear capabilities from the IAEA and the Zionist media and American media are having a field day reporting this false information. So here are what the US and Israel’s objectives are and why this is taking place now: First this from the Jerusalem Post:
Experts at the IAEA are in agreement that Teheran has the ability to make a nuclear bomb and is on the way to developing a missile system able to carry an atomic warhead, according to a secret report seen by The Associated Press on Thursday.

It appears to be the so-called "secret annex" on Teheran's nuclear program that Washington says is being withheld by the IAEA's chief.

According to the document, the Islamic republic has "sufficient information" to build a bomb. Iran is likely to "overcome problems" on developing a delivery system, according to the report
However the IAEA is denying this, more on that in a minute. First I want to point out a little propaganda trick in today’s reports regarding the false leak and then move on to what is really taking place regarding an attack on Iran. Notice the reference to the IAEA’s Chief? As if he was the only committee member involved in creating the report. Here’s a clue, HINT it’s in his name “Dr. Mohamed Mostafa ElBaradei”

Whilst his name is not used in the Jpost article, it is used in hundreds of others that are directed to Western readers. The Jews already know Arabs have the audacity to participate in the UN equally. However, for the West, it’s a subliminal message which is: (Arab=Muslim=Can’t be trusted)And one more little factoid of interest. Dr. Mohamed Mostafa ElBaradei is the OUTGOING Chief of the IAEA, his successor is Yukiya Amano who is obviously NOT Arabic. You see it just does not strike the same sort of fear into the Zionists, Islamophobics and neo-cons when it’s a name like “Amano”

The next reason this propaganda is taking place right now should be obvious, but just in case, here it is from the Guardian today:
Attention will now focus on the United Nations in New York next week, where Obama takes the rare step of chairing a Security Council session in order to generate momentum towards nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and consensus over Iran
But, there is more to this still.Israel and the US are in the process of taking steps to justify some sort of siege or military action on Iran and they are using this "false report" from some "un-named" source as part of their basis. Here’s why:
The urgency of dealing with the Iranian nuclear threat was underscored today when a leaked report revealed that the UN inspection agency believes the Islamic republic has "sufficient information" to make a nuclear weapon and has "probably tested" a key component.
Note the careful wording of the Propaganda based on a false report anyone remember Iraq??? The false reports used to attack Iraq? Has Bush/Cheney left the Whitehouse? But the biggest hint that America and Israel are going after Iran comes from this section below, which I will explain after the series of excerpts:
A day after Barack Obama scrapped plans to deploy missile defence technology in Eastern Europe; the Associated Press said it had obtained material from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which suggests that it was more convinced Iran had been trying to make a bomb than its outgoing director, Mohamed ElBaradei, had admitted.
more on Obama's fancy footwork:
His decision to change tack on missile defence has raised the prospect of improved co-operation with Russia in the Security Council. The Russian Prime Minister, Vladimir Putin, has praised Obama's U-turn as "correct and bold".(pay off!!!!)

"We should explore the potential for linking the US, Nato and Russia missile defence systems at an appropriate time … Both Nato and Russia have a wealth of experience in missile defence. We should now work to combine this experience to our mutual benefit."
And another reason the IAEA findings on Iran must be discredited is this; if the report is not discredited, then only Israel has nukes in the Middle East. And why is that a problem? Because Obama "Claims" he wants to rid the region of all nukes in his fancy Campaign speeches, and now needs a reason to allow only Israel to keep them. Just look at this report:
VIENNA (Reuters) - The U.N. nuclear assembly on Thursday adopted a resolution urging all Middle East nations to foreswear atomic bombs in a symbolic vote showing increasing consensus for the measure.

Israel is one of only three countries worldwide along with India and Pakistan outside the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and is widely assumed to have the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal,

The non-binding ballot at the annual International Atomic Energy Agency assembly was 100-1 with four abstentions
Can you guess how America voted? Given that Obama "Supposedly" wants all nations to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty?
Approving Thursday's resolution were all industrialized states except the United States, Canada, Georgia, which abstained, as did India. Asian, Latin American, African, Arab and Islamic states voted YES.
And today this:
the IAEA General Conference approved a resolution urging Israel to sign up to the Non-Proliferation Treaty and to place its nuclear facilities under UN inspections.

For the first time in nearly two decades the issue of Israel's nuclear weapons was put on the table despite Western governments' efforts to thwart off a vote on the resolution, arguing it would be unhelpful to “single out Israel” after a resolution had passed the day before calling on all Middle Eastern countries to put a ban on nuclear weapons.
So, Arabs want to rid the world of ALL nukes, and Israel/America say "no" Remind me again who wants peace? So now Obama must find a way to sell this to the world and using a false "leak" from a "false non existing report" is the first step in the plan:Here is Israel, I mean America's policy:
Israel argued that while a NWFZ is a commendable ideal, it is not feasible as long as some Arab neighbors continue not to recognize the Jewish state, with Islamist Iran openly calling for its elimination.

Arab diplomats point to an imbalance of power in the Middle East caused by unchecked Israeli power and say it breeds instability and spurs others to seek weapons of mass destruction.
Remind me again who wants peace? So what was Israel’s response to this vote?
Israel welcomed Arab states' readiness this year to adjust language objectionable to it but said it voted no because the draft retained a clause calling "upon all states in the region to accede" to the NPT.
And there you have it, direct from the Zionist mouth. Israel does not want to, and will not sign up to, the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) So, without all this false propaganda coming out today about the IAEA and Iran, it would only be poor little Isarel isolated as the sole Nuclear Nation in the Middle East, this at a time when ALL other Middle Eastern countries want to see ALL Nukes removed from the region. Unless Iran can be manufactured into some massive threat, the world and the Middle East will demand Obama call on Israel to sign the treaty. And we all know he cannot stand up to Israel, after all, they run America. So Iran is the convenient excuse. Here is what the IAEA has to say about the “secret report” and the “un-named source” propaganda being spread as “fact” today:
The UN atomic watchdog said Thursday it has no concrete proof that there is or has been a nuclear weapons programme in Iran.

The International Atomic Energy Agency rejected a US media report which claimed its experts believed Tehran had the ability to make a nuclear bomb and was on the way to developing a missile system able to carry an atomic warhead.

"With respect to a recent media report, the IAEA reiterates that it has no concrete proof that there is or has been a nuclear weapon programme in Iran," a statement said.

According to the (US and Isareli) media report, the proof was contained in a so-called "secret annex" to the IAEA's latest report on Iran, but was deliberately being withheld by the agency's director general Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei. (Ooooooooo, be afraid, be very afraid, it's the man with the Arabic name......)

"At the board of governors meeting on September 9, Director General ElBaradei warned that continuing allegations that the IAEA was withholding information on Iran are politically motivated and totally baseless," it said.
Yes, politically motivated, exactly! There's more, here's Israel's pay off. Remember this being reported on the 12th of September, just five days ago
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a secret trip to Russia, a deputy prime minister confirmed on Saturday, but declined to give specific information on the mission.

"He was in Russia. It created some controversy about the way it was published in Israel," Dan Meridor told Reuters while in Geneva for an international conference.
"The content was not discussed in public. Some things are better discussed (privately)," Meridor told Reuters.
So,if you have not figured all this out yet, here’s what is going on, using the false "leaked" so called "Secret Report" from the "secret Un-named source" coupled with the fact that the US and Israel have made a deal with Russia, hence the removal of the Missile Defence System from Europe as was stated above. Putin is a happy chappy and may have just sold Iran and the entire Middle East right down the crapper. And remember this? Good ole Netanyahu vanishes from Israel last week, the Israeli media begins to question is absence, after 2 days it is revealed in a leak that he “may” be in Russia, then next day it was confirmed.

Rest assured Netanyahu gave Putin something as well as Obama removing the Missile Defence System from Europe. So, with Russia out of the way, its clear sailing for an attack on Iran based on false information. Having said that, I certainly hope the America public and everyone else will remember where we have seen this before ? So, if you can’t see it by now you are blind. What is taking place now is taken DIRECTLY out of the Bush/Cheney game plan book, only this time A La Obama, exactly like what took place JUST before the attack on Iraq; see if this jogs your memory:
From CNN in 2003 "I cannot tell you everything that we know," Powell said, with CIA Director George Tenet sitting behind him. "But what I can share with you, when combined with what all of us have learned over the years, is deeply troubling."

U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell presented as evidence against Iraq:

Drawings and diagrams said to illustrate Iraqi mobile biological labs (faked and lies)

Assertions that Iraqi nerve gas is unaccounted for (faked and lies)

Images said to support the assertion that Iraq continues to pursue nuclear weapons (BIG LIE JUST LIKE NOW WITH IRAN)

Assertions that Baghdad has had high-level, long-standing links to al Qaeda (There was NO Al Qaeda in Iraq when Saddam was in power, he kept them out and despised them, but now, thanks to America Al Qaeda IS in Iraq, way to go USA you really know how to screw up a country!)
ATTENTION AMERICA: Don't be FOOLED again like you were with Iraq! Don't go to war based on another FAKE non-existing document, Don't make Iran into another Iraq never ending disaster, Don't screw up the world for Israel, Take America back from Israeli control,
PICK PEACE FOR ONCE OVER WAR!!!

MAKE ISRAEL SIGN THE TREATY LIKE IRAN DID

3 comments:

Greg Bacon said...

Why don't any of the stories about the "Arctic Sea" mention the obvious in regards to the alleged smuggling of Russian S-300 anti-aircraft missiles to Iran: Why take the long and dangerous route?

If someone in Russia wanted to smuggle some items to Iran, why go to all the trouble of moving them to a Finnish port, loading them onto a ship, then plying the Baltic, then the North Sea, then the Mediterranean to Algiers. From there, they'd have to go on a dangerous 5,000 mile land journey across N. Africa to the Horn, where'd they'd have to be loaded again onto a ship that would have to cross the Persian Gulf that has so many US Navy ships that it needs a traffic cop.

Why not just use that backyard Russian lake known as the Caspian Sea?

This smuggling/hijack story makes no sense, unless it's being used to feed the same 'Echo Chamber' that was instrumental in selling the Iraq invasion to gullible Americans, running at full blast. Only this time around, trying to find that Niger 'yellowcake' story that has sticking power is proving to be daunting.

Looks like Judith Miller is still plying her trade.

But I could be wrong, after all Israel has proven time and again to have an impeccable record when it comes to telling the truth, right?

Egoigwe said...

Oh please, Russia sell Iran out? For what? Non-performing missile shields? The whole world knows that stuff doesn't work and besides the author fails to mention what Russia would be giving up in actual worth. America's removal of those shields does not amount to much in actual worth since they can be replaced (as already hinted by Obama himself) with better and more effective ones after Iran would have been devastated, a puppet regime installed and its oil reserves cornered at which time Russia would be left holding the can.

It doesn't make any sense to say Russia would give up its very lucrative, economic-sustaining trade with Iran for the removal of non-performing missile shields. The author equally fails to tell us what he thinks Israel could possibly offer Russia that compares to the tangibles which Iran has already placed on the table. The assertion that Russia has sold Iran off for those reasons just does not make any sense or add up. Just look at the trade flow chart between Russia and Iran, then tell me how one can possibly believe that a sell-off of Iran by Russia is about to happen.

Irish4Palestine said...

@ Egoigwe

Hate to say I told you so, but I told you so. I held your comment (from Sept 21) because I knew I’d be able to refute it in a matter of days when the UN meetings began. Today is Sept 23 (two days later) and this (below) was published, although SOME OF US could read the politics MUCH earlier.

“President Obama’s biggest foreign policy gamble appeared to pay off last night as Russia opened the door to punishing new sanctions on Iran to halt its nuclear programme.”

AND THIS:

“Mr Medvedev’s – admittedly lukewarm – support for sanctions is seen as payback for Washington’s decision to move its defensive missile shield from Poland and the Czech Republic to the Mediterranean.”


read it and weep here: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6846837.ece


So Egoigwe , that would be “point score and win for the Irish” I’ve been dealing in political strategy for too long to not read what is going on

Post a Comment

COMMENT POLICY UPDATE:

1. Comments accepted for one week only, posts older than one week, comments will be rejected.

2. We welcome your comments, but we operate on Dublin Ireland time and are 5 hours ahead of the US East Coast, hence comments may not appear immediately

3. Comments are moderated by the blog owners and writers