23 June 2009

Look Who 's Supporting Iranian Protesters

after reading this post below, take a look at what Desertpeace turned up about this very same thing!!

Shah of Iran's Son asks Israel to help him become ruler of Iran.

The ousted Shah of Iran Mohammad-Reza Pahlavi's son urges Israel to support post-election riots in Iran to bring down the government of Tehran.

Reza Pahlavi, who is seen as a promising figure in pushing for a change of the government in Iran, told Maariv (which is a right wing Hebrew paper) that Israel should back up recently sparked riots in Iran following the re-election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as the next president of the country.

The very existence of the ruling government in Iran could lead to a nuclear Holocaust, the former crown prince (and obvious converted Zionist) said but warned against an Israeli attack on the country.
Yeah, Yeah, I known what you’re thinking, this report comes from Presstv, ok, but this next one doesn’t. And more over, it shows how “closely” allied Israel was with the Shah and his Family. So, a grain of truth to chew on. The following is from Washington Report on Middle East Affairs website in 1993. Can you say “collaboration?”
Provoking Iran into launching a war is also the theme of a Feb. 12 article entitled "Iran is an Existential Threat" by Ya'akov Erez, the editor and former military correspondent of the right-wing daily Ma'ariv. Ma'ariv is currently owned by Ofer Nimrodi, the son of Ya'akov Nimrodi, who before the fall of the shah was Israeli military attache in Tehran. The senior Nimrodi, who had cultivated extremely amicable relations with the shah and some of his high-ranking officials, is the same Israeli who later was so deeply involved in the Irangate scandal. He was one of those who persuaded the Reagan administration to permit Israel secretly to sell U.S. arms to Iran, while the U.S. publicly was supporting Iraq in its war with Iran. link
What I find quite Prophetic, is yet another blog post (below) from 2003 no less, regarding the Bush Admin and Israel ramping up for an attack on Iran, using the media and the Shah's son to fan flames. I was surprised that some aspects of this small post have come true. Only the difference is that now it's not only the Television media being used, but also youtube, twitter, facebook along with American Progressive Blogs.

Here’s the little post from 2003:
Thursday, May 08, 2003 Bush Administration Readying for 2004 Invasion of Iran
Centre for Research on Globalisation -- March 23

by John Stanton
Between April of 2003 and November 2004, the US, UK and Israel will accelerate instability operations in Iran and engage in global disinformation campaigns to belittle the political and military leadership there.

They will take to the airwaves to portray (Iran) to Americans a country beset by internal strife and dissension.
(Wow, this guys crystal ball works really good!! But now it's not just the airwaves, it's the Progressive blogs that push Obama's agenda using all the online weapons, such as youtube, facebook and twitter to help create the Iran "revolution" and overthrow)
Corporate media will revisit the Iranian Hostage Crisis and display for war-hungry Americans footage from the 1978-80 timeframe. That will include images of Khomeni's henchmen hanging and executing the Shah's secret police.
(He's pretty spot on here as well, as we ARE seeing on CNN scenes of the overthrow of the American Dictator the Shah, almost daily, again amazing this was written in 2003!!)
Reza Pahlavi, son of the former Shah of Iran, will be featured with greater frequency on CNN, Fox, ABC, NBC, CBS and PBS.
Whoa, did you get that? either #1 this guy was truly psychic in 2003, or #2 people are being seriously duped right now by an Obama/Israeli agenda. I vote #2

Check out MSNBC one of Obamas propaganda media outlets, quoting another of Obama's media outlets the Washington Post:
The Washington Post: "Obama's approach to Iran, including his assertion that the unrest there represents a debate among Iranians unrelated to the United States, is an acknowledgment that a U.S. president's words have a limited ability to alter foreign events in real time and could do more harm than good. But privately Obama advisers are crediting his Cairo speech for inspiring the protesters, especially the young ones, who are now posing the most direct challenge to the republic's Islamic authority in its 30-year history." link
Notice the last line? That's the agenda, overthrow them, but only after the American public "asks" him to.

And Looky here, CNN joins the group with this addition:
Iranian protester pleads for U.S., world to intervene

An Iranian student protester in Tehran made a passionate plea for help from the world community this morning in a phone call to CNN’s “American Morning.”

For safety reasons, CNN can only identify the student by his first name, Mohammad. He’s been a part of the protests and a target of the violence there. link
Soon Americans themselves will be calling for Obama to "take action" on Iran, the constant videos YouTube and the Mainstream media show 24/7 of the protesters, coupled with constant "Drip Drip Drip" coming from all sides including online and mainstream media that Obama is not doing "enough" That's the plan, Shhhhhhhhh don't tell anyone.....

Perfect! Yes, Obama will remain out of the fray, until the progressive left in America with it's big popular Progressive blogs connected to Obama and it's Democratic Think Tanks connected to Obama,the same mainstream news stations who supported him, coupled with using the same Social Media he used to get elected, along with other countries Obama can manipulate like Germany, France and England, will ALL chime out together, in one great progressive Democratic voice for Obama to "act" to "help" the protesters. But the biggest boon for obama is that the Republicans will be rejoicing for him as well as the progressive left. They love a good invasion, especially one that involves Muslims and one that makes AIPAC and Israel turn cartwheels. Yes, I can see it now, Bill O'Reilly will be waving Obama flags and telling his viewers what a great POTUS he is for going after Iran. Obama's promise to unite Red States and Blue states will have happened, everyone will want him to intervene in Iran,(for their own reasons) For the left it will be because of the horrible images and unverified reports we are seeing daily from Iran which give the impression that the "Majority" of the country wants what the protesters want. for the Right wing neocon nutjobs, it will be because they are paranoid and hate Muslims and support Zionists.

Yes, Obama will have an open door to intervention into Iran's affairs, just what Obama said he'd never do. The difference is, he would never do it without knowing he can point to Americans and other countries who are "asking" him to interfere, that would be you people btw. This way he gets to do what he ultimately wanted to do in the first place regarding Iran, and also it makes Israel happy as a pig in shit, and at the same time Obama will appear to the world as the Knight In Shinning Armour, riding in to bring Freedom and Justice to Iran, just like Bush did in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were both a massive success (sarcasm)

Yes, America, YOU will be begging Obama to punish Iran very soon, which, is exactly what he wants you to do. Then he can say he's only reacting to "public" opinion and outrage, which, of course he and his allied groups and supportive media either purposely helped create, or were stupidly used to create and push an agenda, take yur pick. But, most Americans don't see this with their collective heads in the sand in Obama Koolaid land.

I wrote about the America meddling here and here respectively, for those interested I am no fan or supporter of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and I find many aspects of the Islamic part of the "republic" that I do not like nor support. However, this does not translate into being duped into supporting sanctions or an attack on Iran by the American President (and Israel!!!)using his online groups, social media and the mainstream media spreading heartbreaking videos of protesters and giving the impression that the majority of Iranians want to overthrow the Islamic Republic, to then trick people into allowing Obama to intervene in another country. All those people demonstrating want change and more freedoms, that is very true indeed, however, they do not represent the entire country. They are the beginning, the seeds are sown. But, Iran needs to be allowed to progress into change "naturally" so that it will be accepted by all people living there over time, and more importantly, so it will last and not be tarred by the West's intervention.......again!


Barbara L said...

This "Prince" sounds as if he is as bad a piece of work as his filthy father and flighty spoiled mother.

Many years ago I worked at the Royal Ontario Museum, they were still in power then. She owed the museum thousands and thousands of dollars and never even acknowledged her debt and she had "borrowed" some archaelogical relics for some show in Tehran and never returned them either.

pfft to this person. He is pure Zionist. Just as the rest of that filthy crew. And yes, I too see it panning out. The news in the US is full of "What is OBAMA going to DO?" stuff.

That whole mess reeks of CIA and Mossad. They have played with the phone systems, computers, put in so much disinfo to stir up riots and misunderstandings. This is a new form of warfare as I touched on the other day.

Did you know, that in Gaza they made very sure NOT to hit any of the telecommunications sites because they WANTED the cell phones to be in operation. To listen in and also for locating people.

Sometimes I wish we lived in less interesting times.

PlanetMichelle@ said...

yeah ain't they tricky. Are you actually becoming suspicious of the Obama agenda? Since I recently read that Natenyahu has declared the U.S. hostile to Israeli interests, I was beginning to think maybe my Obama suspicions are wrong. Maybe he is a straight shooter.
Well one thing I know is if he is on the line, the rattlesnake Israelis are going to emasculate him right in front of us...like they did all the rest of the U.S presidents. It would be sad. He should have talked more with Louis Farrakhan, that's what I will be thinking. If not then he is a snake too and I won't be sad about anything just my usual mad.

Post a Comment


1. Comments accepted for one week only, posts older than one week, comments will be rejected.

2. We welcome your comments, but we operate on Dublin Ireland time and are 5 hours ahead of the US East Coast, hence comments may not appear immediately

3. Comments are moderated by the blog owners and writers