14 May 2010

ZIONIST LOBBY GOING AFTER GALLOWAY AGAIN

Heads up all you freedom loving Americans. The "American Jewish Committee" for "Global Jewish Advocacy" are trying to get America to become like Canada and censor free speech.
link AJC expressed serious concern at the arrival in the United States of George Galloway. He is slated to speak at events hosted by American Muslims for Palestine and the Muslim Legal Fund of America in a number of locations, beginning in northern California on May 16.
And here comes the typical diatribe of Islamophobic fear mongering nonsense:
"Only a few days after voters ousted George Galloway from the British Parliament, has he returned to our country to seek additional funds for Hamas, which the U.S. government has designated a terrorist organization?" asked AJC Executive Director David Harris. "We trust the authorities will scrutinize Galloway's activities while here, since any money raised for and transferred to terrorist groups is a violation of U.S. law."
Shall I remind people that Hamas was elected in a Democratic election that was monitored by the international community, including the US of A? Even George Bush said with glee, we hail this democratic election, that is, until he saw who won. It's called democracy, you either support it or you support dictatorship, if you support democracy then you must accept the results, end of.

Comments (10)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Login or signup now to comment.
The Palestinian people were given a free election and they had the audacity to vote for the leaders they wanted. That’s not the way we run elections in the west – check the recent history in the US and Britain. The slaves must welcome their bondage.

These shysters and shylocks hide their venom behind the usual jewish lies. George has never been a supporter of Hamas but he has been a steadfast supporter of the Palestinian people.

One word of caution to these criminals, The Symington Amendment forbids the US from giving any aid to a country with nuclear weapons which will not join the NNPT, or allow inspections of its nuclear sites. How would they like that made common knowledge. What would the loss of $3 billion annually mean to the zionazi state?
Reply
1 reply · active 784 weeks ago
Cheers Chucky, George would support whomever the Palestinian people elect, as do we here in Ireland. And yes America needs to look in the mirror, their weapons murdered many children in Gaza. The sooner America stops funding Israeli terrorism, and that's exactly what it is, then the better. Israel has a captive population of 1.5 million sitting there inside a 20 mile by 5 mile strip of land, israel uses them for target practice when ever they get itchy fingers, it's a disgrace, and all the while starvng them. I read where israel actually did a study to see what was the "minimum" amount of calories needed to keep an adult and child alive in Gaza, they then decide how much food will be allowed in based on caloric intake, they're policies are evil.
Reply
Hey there, freedom-loving American Muslim here, hehe - Yes, I was saddened to see Galloway lose his seat in the British Parliament.

Indeed, Islamophobic, fear-mongering propaganda. As chuckyman has stated, Galloway doesn't support Hamas - but even if he did - as is stated, they are the elected party, so what's the problem? The man just wants to speak - is freedom of speech a selective right all of a sudden?

Thanks for the post I4P.
Reply
2 replies · active 784 weeks ago
i'm afradi that in Britain, like in America the indiginous population is suffering from "immigration" phobia, usual when it comes to anyone with darker than white skin. This election inEngland saw many zionists get elected. The tories are right wing as well, so people may be in for a rough ride i'm afraid. so far as George supporting Hamas, he would support whom the people of Palestine elect, like we do in Ireland.
Reply
Thanks for the insight and for the example in Ireland that you've commented on below. I am actually interested in British politics, as I have family there and actually spent 3 weeks there in Jan/Feb instead of going home, anyways, I digress.
Reply
continued:
I'm an Irish Repubican, as such I know what it is like when our people were elected and others did not respect our mandate. Whatever people's views are on hamas, they are more in line with US policy with regards to resolving the conflict than israel is. Hamas wants a deal based on 67 borders, jsut like America. they also want to talk to AMerica, but obama is too owned by the Zionist lobby to do what is needed and bring them into negotiations. Unless this happens, no peace will last, it didn't work here in Ireland when the US tried backing only the SDLP and ignored Sinn Fein who had a huge mandate and represented over 1/2 the population. It took Bill Clinton to break ranks and shake Gerry Adams hand against tony blairs wishes, then the road to REAL peace began. Obams should leanr from clinton on conflict resolution, as far as US presidents he was the best at conflict resolution.
Reply
1 reply · active 784 weeks ago
Indeed, a lot of the time you have to go against the grain to really get somewhere and not follow the status quo and bow down to internal pressures. So much for being the most powerful person in the world - when you can't even use your own judgment and principles while ruling a "free" nation.
Reply
correction when I said over half he population I was referring to Irish, not unionists
Reply
1 reply · active 784 weeks ago
Sure we’ll train them eventually (grin)
Reply
Bang on the money I4P. A genuine and fair ballot carries the weight of the people’s voice. The problem for real democrats around the world is that so many ballots have been undermined for the purpose of “colour” revolutions. They became the tools of imperialist power and not the empowerment of popular change.

I have learned to ignore whatever fine speeches Obama gives and to watch for the administration’s actions. When I consider the never ending list of dual-national appointments I can only confer that there is no desire for a negotiated peace – only an imposed one. Washington is an openly occupied government and it is (political) suicide to say it out loud.

As an example, I hear that the US is to pay for a new weapon system for the ZioNazi’s. http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=12...
That’s on top of the increase in annual aid. If only those billions were used to provide clean water and anti-diarrhoea treatment in the third world. What would do to America’s reputation in the world?

No, they will continue to pour in vast amounts of aid for a regime that practices an endless list of evils. Israel does not want peace, it wants land. With the entire US government in thrall to the Lobby (in all its guises) the Palestinian people have no one to talk to. The current 2 state solution is dead and buried. Time for a new strategy – Unilateral Declaration of Independence anyone?
Reply

Comments by