Clinton's Israeli Handlers May Want Refund

Clinton’s Israeli Handlers may want their money back soon. They are thinking to themselves; “Damn, all that money and she goes and says this";

"We want Iran to calculate what I think is a fair assessment: that if the United States extends a defense umbrella over the region, if we do even more to develop the military capacity of those (allies) in the Gulf, it is unlikely that Iran will be any stronger or safer,"

What they were hoping for and expecting was this statement;

“Go ahead Israel, use your “secret nukes” to Bomb the Shit out of Iran and wipe them off the face of the earth. Don’t worry, we will cover for you as always.”

So, failing an imminent re-education of Clinton by THESE PEOPLE, they may ALL be asking for a full refund soon. Story below:

Israel slams Clinton statement on nuclear Iran

A key minister in the Israeli government criticized U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's statement on Tuesday that Washington would provide "a defense umbrella" for its allies in the Middle East in the event that Iran develops nuclear weapons.

Dan Meridor, Israel's minister for secret services, told Army Radio that the comments imply a willingness to reconcile with the eventuality of a nuclear-armed Iran.

OOOOOOOPS, I should have read further, the "re-education camp" will be taking place soon, see here:

Next Wednesday, a senior U.S. delegation led by National Security Adviser James Jones will arrive in Israel. He will be accompanied by President Barack Obama's special Mideast adviser, Dennis Ross, who recently served as Clinton's special adviser on Iran.

The delegation will also include representatives of the CIA, Defense Department, Treasury and State Department. These officials were invited to Israel by National Security Advisor Uzi Arad, who will lead the Israeli side in what is said to be a continuation of talks held in Washington around three weeks ago.

Like I said........

Israel & Obama Have a Deal, But What?

When ever I hear of Israel “suddenly” deciding to offer a “concession” to Obama, I start to worry immediately and look for the real reason. For instance, why would Israel suddenly be publicizing that they will remove “in one day” 23 settlements? What a great sound-bite, but let’s look deeper. Firstly, it is important to note that these “settlements” are actually small horrid little outposts, like Zionist camping grounds existing on Palestinian land. They are NOT the big shiny impressive ones with lots of settler cockroaches living in big beautiful Israeli built homes over looking the hovels of the former residents of said development. No, we are not talking about “those” settlements.

So, there is something amiss, and, upon reflection, I can some up with a few reasons for Israel’s very “sudden” public decision to remove “in one day” 23 illegal “campgrounds” I mean “settlements.”

Israel never does anything for “right or moral” reasons. Only self gratifying selfish ones that advance the rogue Zionist state’s agendas. So:

1. Either Israel is offering this in the hopes it will satisfy Obama and allow Israel to keep the big settlements.

2. Or worse, it’s a token to give Obama so that Obama can claim some sort of victory on the settlement issue and now start demanding double time movement from HAMAS on accepting Israel as a Jewish state, translation, attempting remove the Right of Return for Palestinians who still have keys in their hands.

3. Or, perhaps it is all part of a trade from Israel to Obama, in order to secure Obama’s blessing for an Israeli strike on Iran. Let us not forget that early on Israel said that any peace deals with Palestine would be linked to progress on what Israel sees as needing to happen to Iran. In other words a military strike. See HERE where they link I/P peace to Obama dealing with Iran. So, if Israel is moving on the issue of Campgrounds, I mean settlements, than what deal has been struck, one wonders...

Either way, it’s a ruse by Israel to get something much bigger than what it offers. That’s the “Zionist Style” of negotiation in a nut shell. here's the story:

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel plans to remove in a single day all 23 unauthorized settler outposts slated for evacuation in the occupied West Bank, a move that would meet a long-standing pledge to Washington, a newspaper said on Tuesday.

The report in Haaretz gave no date for removing the outposts, where some of the most militant settlers in the West Bank live, but said the military held an exercise last week to prepare for their evacuation.

Haaretz, a left-leaning newspaper, said the military was preparing to "forcibly evacuate 23 illegal outposts in one day. The plan was formulated by the security establishment, with the knowledge of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu."

Netanyahu has so far refused to commit to a total freeze, in the most serious rift between Israel and the United States, its main ally, in a decade.

In May, Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilnai said the removal of the outposts, often a cluster of caravans on isolated hilltops built without government authorization, had become a "central issue" for the Netanyahu's administration.

COMMITMENT
The Defense Ministry says it will not reveal the locations of all the outposts to maintain an element of surprise but they include those built after March 2001, a group that Israel committed to remove during the administration of former U.S. president George W. Bush.

The evacuation is expected to be met with resistance from the settlers. Wallerstein said that some 8,000 people live at the outposts.

The Haaretz report was written by one of its most respected columnists, Yoel Marcus, who was also the first to disclose the plans of former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to withdraw soldiers and settlers from the Gaza Strip, a plan that came to fruition in 2005. source

Yeah, some deal has been done with Obama, what that deal is we will soon find out!

Penniless Americans Hand Over Their Money

Americans, Do you have a pot to piss in? Or if you are lucky enough to have your own pot, do you find you cannot afford a window to throw it out of?

Are you an American out of work? Are you a struggling American who lost your home? Are you living from paycheck to paycheck, are you wondering how you will survive until your next paycheck? Are you wondering how you will send your kids to college? Pay the doctor bill if someone gets sick? What about that new car you need? What about a vacation? What about your retirement?

Well, no need to worry, Obama to the rescue, no not really. But, you could start by telling him you want to keep your money in your pocket, instead of paying $23,240 dollars for every Israeli in Israel (1997 figures, so much worse now) And allowing Obama to give yet another 3 BILLION per year, over the next TEN YEARS, for a total of 30 BILLION of your taxpayer money to Israel. Just so you know, this is the number they get for the next ten years 30,000000000 now wouldn't Americans be better served by keeping that money for America? What would 30,000000000 buy Americans? Perhaps funding Universal Health Care for Americans, instead of giving it to Israel? And that's not all folks, have a look at these numbers of 7 million a day to Israel now read this out today:

TEL AVIV, Israel, July 8 (UPI) -- Despite differences between the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama and Israel over Iran and the Middle East peace process, and human-rights groups' allegations of war crimes against the Palestinians, Washington continues to provide the Jewish state with billions of dollars' worth of arms and equipment every year.

And there's no sign that this will change any time soon.

Indeed, Obama has endorsed a military aid package worth up to $30 billion, without conditions, over the next 10 years that was set up by the administration of President George W. Bush in 2007.

That represents a 25 percent increase in the vast U.S. military and security assistance given to Israel during the Bush administration.

With annual military aid of some $2 billion, Israel is the largest recipient of U.S. largesse in the world. source

Feeling a bit sick now are you? Check out these numbers, which only go up to 1997, SO REMEMBER TO ADD ANOTHER 12 YEARS ONTO THESE NUMBERS and take a deep breath:

U.S. Financial Aid To Israel: Figures, Facts, and Impact

Summary
Benefits to Israel of U.S. Aid
Since 1949 (As of November 1, 1997)

Foreign Aid Grants and Loans
$74,157,600,000

Other U.S. Aid (12.2% of Foreign Aid)
$9,047,227,200

Interest to Israel from Advanced Payments
$1,650,000,000

Grand Total
$84,854,827,200

Total Benefits per Israeli
$14,630
Cost to U.S. Taxpayers of U.S.
Aid to Israel

Grand Total
$84,854,827,200

Interest Costs Borne by U.S.
$49,936,680,000

Total Cost to U.S. Taxpayers
$134,791,507,200

Total Taxpayer Cost per Israeli
$23,240

as I said, these are only up to 1997, so add another 12 years to these figures, now go have a stiff drink, in your pot, without a window to throw it out of..........

"DONE DEAL" Iran Will Be Attacked

7-7-09 UPDATED X1 Cyber War Fare may be used against Iran's nuclear plant, see here Original post from 7-6-09 below:

Well, I wrote about Obama's mask slipping, and it seems it is now proven to be true. Read that post for background.

Now, later today we seem to have the confirmation that backs up Biden's remarks, directly from Mossad and the "why" is explained. The "why" is a deal done between Obama on settlements and the Israeli-Palestine conflict in a direct trade for allowing Israel to go forward with it's attack on Iran.

Israel strike threat on Iran back on table

JERUSALEM // A flurry of media reports in Israel and elsewhere, as well as comments by US officials, past and present, have suddenly put the possibility of an Israeli military strike on Iran firmly back on the agenda.

Certainly, the turmoil in Iran after elections that saw the incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad returned under controversial circumstances, has contributed to a firming of the tone by US officials on Iran. This was most notable in an interview Joe Biden, the US vice president, gave ABC News in which he said Israel, as a sovereign nation, would decide for itself how to deal with Iran.

I wrote about the attempts by Israel-USA-Britain to overthrow the Iranian Government, and if that failed what would happen.) article continues:

“One explanation [for Mr Biden’s remarks] is that a deal was done between the US and Israel,” said Yossi Alpher, an Israeli analyst and a former Iran specialist with Mossad, Israel’s foreign intelligence service. “On the same day that Biden made his remarks, Netanyahu opened his cabinet meeting by saying that in the first 100 days of his government, an Israeli consensus had been reached on the two-state solution.”

Mr Alpher said Mr Netanyahu felt that Israel needed to make concessions on the Palestinian issue to secure US support for his government’s position on Iran “if and when” Israel needs to strike Iran.

“It certainly looked like a deal had been done,” he said.

And here's the proof in a 2nd article, check out the "insanely upbeat lovefest" tone of this 2nd report:

Barak: Israel will dismantle outposts within months (In exchange for being allowed to strike Iran)

Mitchell assured by Barak that Israel will dismantle the 23 illegal outposts in space of weeks or months – not years

Seriously, why would Israel even remotely entertain this option of dismantling the settlements all of a sudden like? When they have consistently dug in their heels and continued expansion and ethnic cleansing. Clearly Israel has been offered Iran in exchange for a Palestinain two state solution. And rest assured if Obama is this devious, then the Palestinian deal will truly be a shitty one for Palestine and a great one for Israel. More:

Barak also told Mitchell that Israel expects to see trust-building gestures from Arab states, as well as Palestinian reciprocation for Israeli gestures. Israel is demanding, among other things, that the Palestinians acknowledge a future agreement as an end to the conflict, recognize Israel as the national home of the Jewish people, establish law and order systems, and provide an answer on the status of the Gaza Strip and Hamas. link

Yes, I'd say the "Deal is Done" welcome to war "Obama Style"

ATTACK IRAN~Obama's Mask Slips Off

Anybody ever truly believe Obama was going to be "different?"

UPDATED 7-7-09 it appears that Israel may use Cyber War Fare to attack Iran's nuclear facility, see here Original post from 7-6-09 below:

Israel, England and the US all had parts to play. Israel's job was to keep up the mantra of attacking Iran, so as to scare monger the Iranian population. Israel played the part of "attack dog" Whilst Britain played the part of insider agitator and intelligence gatherers and Obama played the part of being "above the Fray" A part he perfected when running for President during the primaries. It was never Obama on the attack only his supporters, followers and surrogates, whilst enabling Obama to keep his hands clean. It was always his surrogates. Same tactic being employed right now. keep reading..

Biden says Israel has the right to attack Iran

The U.S. wouldn't interfere with a sovereign nation's actions, he says, even as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff says such an attack would be destabilizing.

Biden's remarks suggested a tougher U.S. stance against Iran's nuclear ambitions, but administration officials denied that. Instead, White House officials said, his televised remarks Sunday simply reflected the U.S. view that Israel had a right to defend itself and make its own decisions on national security.

So does that right to defend one,s country also extend to every other country in the world? What about Palestine? I digress...So, Shall we compare today's comments from Biden (Obama's Sock Puppet) to this report from April 2009, a mere 2 months ago. but.... (Before the Iranian Elections mind you):

APRIL 2009 As Israel and the US continue on a collision course over Iran, Tel Aviv says it hopes to put an end to Iran's nuclear activities with a "heroic operation".

Ever since President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and President Barack Obama signalled willingness for direct talks between the United States and Iran in an effort to end thirty years of diplomatic hostility, Tel Aviv and Washington have edged toward having a falling-out.

According to the report, the Obama White House is mulling over whether to impose sanctions on Tel Aviv should Israel go ahead with a unilateral attack on Iran.

Wowzer, so America feels so strongly in April 2009 about not allowing Isra-Hell to make a unilateral strike on Iran that the US would EVEN consider "sanctions" against Tel Aviv? Yeah, right LOL. The reality is that Obama is running his foreign policy just like he ran his presidential campaign. He's remaining "above" the fray, as always, appearing "God-Like" Whilst all the while his "POSSE" works behind the scenes doing all the things Obama could not get away with overtly. AS that would only spoil the image he has created of himself. No, the deal is Obama has to keep this appearance of being the "Great Hope" of the world. It's all smoke and mirrors, but mostly mirrors. Like the mirror Obama stands in front of every day, telling himself no one is the wiser...........

The sad fact is that in the build up to the Iranian elections the Obama Administration was all about "talking to Iran's Ahmadinejad" all about improving US image, all about "making ties." When in fact, the US had another plan all along. Use Israel to keep the scare tactics up on a possible Iran attack by Israel, and at the same time Obama extends the hand of friendship. Then come the elections, now we will see if the US/Israel/Britain plan will work or not.

Prior to the election funds and covert support were funnelled into Iran's Progressive movement by the US; and Britain assisted with media support using Britain's newly created BBC Persian Channel inside Iran. Iran knows how Britain works perfectly, so do the people of Ireland.

Iran accused Britain of instigating protests, arrested some of its embassy workers and expelled a British Broadcasting Corporation correspondent.

Rosemary Hollis, who teaches Middle East politics at City University London, says Iranian rhetoric about Britain is rooted in a long-held perception that while the United States might be more powerful, Britain is more devious. "The perception is, and you get this across the Middle East, that the Americans are at least straightforward, even if you resent what they're doing. They pretty much come in the front door. But the British pop in the window and nip out the back door," she said.

This is 100% true!more...

Britain has a long history of deep involvement in not only Iran, but across the Middle East during the past 200 years. The 1979 Iranian Revolution focused on the United States because of its long-time support of Iran's Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlevi. But Hollis says Iranian conspiracy theories have always seen Britain as the key supporting player, or even as the grand covert manipulator.

"I think it's only been since the Iranian Revolution that the United States has been the 'Great Satan.'

Analysts say that Iran was particularly incensed about the new British Broadcasting Corporation's Persian language TV station that was started early this year.

Alex Vatanka, a senior Middle East analyst for the Britain-based Jane's Publishing Group, says that compounded official anger about Western broadcasts to Iran when it was already the target of broadcasts by Voice of America's own Persian News Network link

Did ya get that last sentence there? Alex Vatanka has been involved in Iranian affairs since before the Iranian elections. Here's a wee snippet from June 12th regarding a missile test in Iran (taken from an Intelligence site no less) :

" the announcement that there was a deadline by the U.S. may have been received in Tehran as a slap in the face," said Alex Vatanka, a senior Middle East analyst at Janes information Group, particularly coming after Iran's release last week of a American journalist who was jailed for spying.

He called the launch a gift to Ahmadinejad from military hard-liners who hoped that it would demonstrate the country's strength and help boost the President's poll numbers before the June 12th election.

Well, so what? They are merely countering all the covert meddling by US and British intelligence people and groups, like Alex Vatanka and the Intelligence Gathering group he works for (Jane's Publishing Group) a covert intelligence military group, who say this:

Jane’s continues to push the boundaries in open source intelligence gathering, reporting and analysis. Our solutions offer the breadth, depth, accuracy and reach to meet a broad range of needs.

And this:

Intelligence Solutions
Whether your focus is equipment, forces, organisations, business, markets or geopolitics, Jane’s is the authoritative source. No other organisation offers a comparable breadth of coverage or depth of proven expertise. That’s why Jane’s is trusted by clients from more than 180 countries worldwide to provide the latest news and most penetrating analysis.

And of course there is this as well:

Consultancy
Jane’s Strategic Advisory Services (JSAS) provides strategic consulting services to governments and businesses. Use us to carry out detailed, specialist research into key areas of concern, and to prepare reports to feed into your strategic planning process. (Like overthrowing Iran's government perhaps?????) Jane’s unrivalled resources and experience can help you develop and implement a successful strategy. source

And people wonder why Iran is pissed off?

The social media networks were part and parcel of this plan as well, they were to be used the same way Obama's people used them during his campaign. Social media like YouTube, twitter and Facebook to push the mentra of "revolution". And rile up the American public to soften them up for Obama's REAL plan of allowing Israel to attack Iran. Because as we all learned during Obama's run for POTUS, whatever the influential blogs are talking about, soon you see the same thing being covered at MSNBC and CNN and the slew of newspaper outlets who support Obama will soon follow suit with the same coverage as well. All to amplify the effect of "revolution" and to demonize the Iranian election. Soon the American public will be begging Obama to "act" with their permission,that's the plan Obama is smarter than Bush was; Obama knows he must have huge American support to attack another country after what Bush did. So Obama will create the "facts on the ground" that will then get the Great American Public on his side. Yes, soon the American public will be softened up enough to look the other way whilst Israel attacks Iran and destabilises the entire Middle East. Yippee!

Britain used it's BBC Persian news channel to fan the flames of unrest, to question, to place doubt and to spread the mantra of corruption and that the majority of people were against Ahmadinejad. Which is probably not true in the least as he had massive support from the non-academics and less educated Iranians, who, do outnumber the reformists. This is why many of the British reporters have been expelled as well as their embassy staff, which assisted and participated in protests.

Obama never intended to extend a hand to Ahmadinejad, never intended to open the door to friendship and heal old wounds with Iran. Otherwise we'd not be seeing this from Obama now that his "Plan" to overthrow the Islamic Republic failed miserably:

US President Barack Obama pledged during his election campaign to open dialogue with Tehran, but the violent crackdown on Iranian protesters angered by a disputed presidential election appear to have put that plan on hold. link

What a great plan by Obama, if he can get the Reformists elected by creating a "colourful" revolution using protests, US funding and social media, Israel and Britan, to organise and overthrow the Government, then of course he carries on with extending that "hand" of friendship. But, the plan failed and now he uses the Iranian crackdown on massive protests to withdraw the formerly "extended" hand of friendship.

One thing that cannot be reconciled in this plan, is if Obama was willing to talk to Ahmadinejad "without preconditions" as he stated all throughout Obama's primary debates with Hillary Clinton (remember one of the first debates where he said this?) And now that Obama was elected he has also continued to say this as well, until the election failure, that is. So, why would he be willing to talk to Ahmadinejad in 2008 when he was running for POTUS when Ahmadinejad was doing all sorts of things that were troubling to America, yet now all that has happened is that Ahmadinejad was re-elected, and suddenly Obama won't talk to him. That's the "tell"

And don't forget Israel can't attack without help from America, just look at this map if you doubt that. Israel will need to fly into Iraq for re-fuelling or at the very least fly over Iraqi arispace, and just who controls that? Why it's the US of A.

Will America NEVER learn?