WE WERE SCREWED~REFUND PLEASE?

I wish some enterprising Democrat who voted for the Bush incarnate, would put up a site encouraging all those who donated money to his campaign and voted for "change", to petition the DNC and ask for their money back, as they have been lied to.

Just what are they teaching at Harvard Law these days one wonders? Respect for International Law? Respect for the Geneva Convention? It took Obama two days to come out in support of his master, Israel, in order to condemn the the use of International Law and the Geneva Convention with regards to the War Crimes report by Goldstone and his UN team. And this from a man who studied at Harvard Law? How's that for change you can believe in? Feeling used yet? No? Well, we aim to please so perhaps you should be aware of this report out today in which America's masters are now asking for more help to circumvent and destroy the Geneva Convention and International Law. See here:

Israel on Wednesday asked a number of senior members of the Obama administration to assist in curbing the international fallout from the Goldstone Commission report released this week, which accuses Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead.

The Foreign Ministry decided Wednesday to focus their efforts to combat the report's accusations on the United States, Russia and a few other members of the United Nations Security Council and the Human Rights Council that are involved in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I need to point out to people that Obama just made a dirty deal with Russia on the Missile System, this is Putin's pay off for his vote on the Security Council mentioned above and also on any votes regarding Iran. So, how's that for Change you can believe in? And you actually thought Bush left the Whitehouse? Silly you, Oh but there is more:

The Israeli message is that the Goldstone report threatens those countries because it makes the war on terror very difficult,

Sounds like Bush in his so called "War on Terror." An attempt to make people support Israel going outside the realms of International law and the Geneva convention, in other words, it's like the CIA and torture, we can do what we want, we act with impunity and you will support us. Wait, that sounds familiar? We've heard this before, why just yesterday in fact:

Seven former directors of the Central Intelligence Agency asked President Obama on Friday to shut down the new Justice Department inquiry into past abuses during interrogations of terrorism suspects, arguing that it “will seriously damage” the nation’s ability to protect itself. link

Now any American who voted for Obama on his promise to close Guantanamo Bay, reign in the rogue out of control CIA, end the Bush/Cheney oil wars and extend a hand of friendship to the world by using diplomacy, has got to be able to see through this Obama charade by now. But Israel wants even more from their slave Obama:

and therefore efforts must be made to prevent it (Goldstone Report) from being brought before the International Criminal Court in The Hague. source

It is no longer enough for slave Obama to speak out in support of his masters, he now must use all of Americas powers in an illegal way, by doing dirty deals with Russia for votes in the Security Council against Iran and other nefarious situations that help Israel subvert International Law and the Geneva Convention. So effectively the Geneva Convention and International Law will mean nothing from that day forward. I sincerely hope that the US has no problems with other countries who may wish to follow Israel's lead by also choosing to ignore the Law and the Convention. It must be the Law for all, or the Law for none.

HIDE THOSE NUKES & ATTACK IRAN

IS IT TOO MUCH TO ASK?

I mean seriously. It’s like getting up every morning and having to go to a job your conscience requires you to do, but you dread doing. Dragging yourself out of bed, turning on the computer, typing in the word “Israel” with the slim hope that nothing evil, bad, horrible, untoward, Arab death related or land theft related will appear. You wait 2 seconds, and just like yesterday hundreds upon thousands of nasty depressing search results appear like clockwork. Can we just teleport Israel somewhere else in the universe? A place where they can be all alone, where the world can be safe from their aggression, bigotry, racism and war mongering? Maybe in some future world, if by then, Israel has not caused the total annihilation of this planet by succeeding in its “holy war” with America’s help against Arabs, that is. Until then, those of us with a human conscience will get up every day, just like yesterday and tomorrow and we will keep chipping away. So, following that depressing rant, here’s today’s insanity from the AP regarding Israel and nukes, which I will dutifully take apart:

Israel says Mideast not ready for nuclear arms ban

This is to thwart any US efforts to rid the region of nuclear weapons. Think about this for a minute. No matter what your views are on Nuclear Weapons, I believe Obama would like to rid the Middle East of all nukes. Obama wants them all to sign up to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty, which requires inspections by international teams. Now, why would Israel not want to do this? After all, Iran has signed the agreement and allows inspections. Not Israel. This is because only “Israel” actually has nukes in the region, they hide them, and they don’t allow inspection which is why they have NOT signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty like Iran did. Now, common sense dictates that if NO country in the Middle East had nukes, then the threat level in the entire region would go down quickly. Israel doesn’t really want that, it does not serve their purpose which is to anger Iran constantly so that they harden their stance, which in turn gives Israel all the reasons to attack it. They actually used this very same tactic in the run up to the Iranian elections, all the talk of attacking Iran; the mock war games they did, the big mobilazation of troops practicing bombing runs. All designed to ensure an Ahmadinejad victory, it worked. Israel does not want an even playing field in the Middle East; instead, they want the ability to wipe out their neighbours if they decide it suits their Zionist interests of expanding their land grab and controlling the entire region like one giant prison. MORE:

Details and pictures leaked in 1986 to the Sunday Times of London by Mordechai Vanunu, a renegade former technician at Israel's Dimona nuclear plant, led foreign experts to conclude Israel has the world's sixth-largest stockpile of nuclear weapons. Vanunu was later kidnapped by Israeli intelligence agents in Rome, brought back to Israel to stand trial, and served 18 years in prison, including 11 in solitary confinement. Vanunu is now free, but is banned from leaving the country.

Israel's defense minister said in remarks published Thursday that the Middle East is too unruly for a region-wide nuclear arms ban, arguing that the Muslim world must first "behave like Western Europe." Israel is widely believed to possess nuclear arms, though it refuses to confirm or deny it. Barak made no mention of Israeli weapons in the interview, but pointedly said Israel would not agree to a nuclear weapons ban

Now, you really have to look at what this statement is meant to do. Firstly you have to note that it is meant to anger Iran (and other Muslim countries in the Region) by stating that “The Muslim World Must Behave Like Western Europe” In other words telling all Muslims they must become just like Westerners, when they are NOT Westerners, they are Muslims, a different culture. Secondly, he is using the same of Politics of Fear in his statement that Bush used on the American people and the world, as his statement is also directed at the West. When he refers to the region being “too unruly” for a “ban” on Nuclear weapons, in essence what he really means is twofold; ONE- that “Only Israel should be allowed to have Nukes and they will fight the Muslims for you and thus protect you” And TWO-the other subliminal message to the West is again the one where he claims Muslims must behave like Westerners. That is intended to underscore the difference in the Western culture and the Muslim culture; again this is the Politics of Fear being used here. He is attempting to instill fear into Westerners as they have a fundamental lack of knowledge of Muslims and Islam. Israel hopes to keep it that way! Next:

Defense Minister Ehud Barak also said Iran's nuclear program is a threat to world peace. His comments come ahead of a U.S.-sponsored world meeting later this month to discourage nuclear proliferation.

Now this statement is also directed to the West and to Europe. What he is telling them in effect is that Iran is the danger, not Israel. And that everyone should ignore the Nukes Israel already has, and focus only on Iran who does not have any yet. Again, it’s the politics of fear and deflection at work here. Typical Hasbara effect to avoid anyone asking Israel to own up to their stockpile of Nuclear Weapons and sign the treaty. More:

Israeli officials have compared Iran to Nazi Germany and its attempt to eradicate the Jewish people.

Oh how Israel loves to refer to that one statement made by Ahmadinejad, they are ever so greatful to him for giving them one tiny statement they can use over and over again, until the end of time, or the end of Iran. But, how can anyone blame Iran one little bit for saying anything about Israel, it’s only words, whereas opposed to Israel, they actually DO have a track record of attempting to carry our their vile statements such as these:

"We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves." (Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983)

"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population." (Israel Koenig, "The Koenig Memorandum")

"When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be to scurry around like drugged cockroaches in a bottle." (Raphael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defence Forces, New York Times, 14 April 1983)

And he continues by repeating his threat to the Muslim world, that they MUST become “Westernized” see here

"Until the Muslim world from Marakesh to Bangladesh behaves like Western Europe, there can be no debate on nuclear disarmament," Barak told the Yediot Ahronot daily.

And Iran has attacked no one, can Israel say that? A good way to judge the future, is to look to the past. If you do that, then you can clearly see who is the aggressor in the Middle East, and Israel holds that distinction, not Iran. So, let me finish outlining Israel’s duplicity by quoting a former Israeli General, Then ask yourself if Iran made the following statement what would the worlds’ reaction be?

"We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai." (David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978)

Yet all these quotes and many other racist threats of annihilation towards ALL Muslims are conveniently ignored, thanks to America. And Israel is given carte blanche to continue its quest to cleanse the region of all Muslims who refuse to live under Israel’s control.

For more on Israel’s plan to attack Iran with Americas blessing and help, read these posts: Jeff Gates on Israel’s nukes and the danger and this one Israel’s check list almost done, attack Iran before end of year:

ISRAEL'S CHECK LIST~ALMOST COMPLETE!!

The list will be complete by the end of the year. And America, guess what, you’re on the checklist right next to Iran!

Despite the recent damning report from the Goldstone team, despite the hundreds of other Human Rights Reports, despite Israel being the most hated nation in the world…….today Israel is happy. It is happy because its “To Do” checklist has almost been completed.

ISRAEL CHECKLIST
1. Attack Control and destroy Palestine, take all land, murder or displace all residents that will not live under Israeli control.....CHECK

2. Destroy and make a laughing stock of new American President and any plans the US may have of achieving peace in the Middle East whilst taking billions annually off American taxpayers…..CHECK

3. Drag America into the gutter, making it the 2nd most hated country in the world, so Israel has a friend in the gutter…………….CHECK

4. Don’t admit to having nukes, don’t sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty like Iran did and don’t allow any inspectors into your nuclear facilities like Iran does……………..CHECK

Having all but completed numbers 1, 2 and 3, and having fully completed number 4, we now move on to the final goals on the checklist, number 5 and 6

5. Attack Iran, attempt to create a 2nd Palestine, using US sanctions to create a siege, and using Israeli military in an attempt to take out the government and then control all borders after the attack. Thus making Israel the King and controller of the entire Middle East………..CHECK

6. Drag America into a war with Iran by the end of the year………………….CHECK and now.....

Today’s report on Attacking Iran:

Israel will attack Iran's nuclear facilities before the end of the year if the West has not launched an attempt to destroy the (Democratically Elected Government) regime with crippling sanctions, a former senior defence official has claimed.

Ephraim Sneh, Israel's deputy defence minister until 2007, said No Israeli government could put its faith in President Barack Obama's efforts to bring Tehran to the negotiating table over its nuclear programme, he said.

"The Israeli government is the only entity that is responsible for the existence of the Jewish people," he said. "Iran has been explicit in its hostility to Israel time and again. They would use these weapons. (note the only evil rogue state who has actually USED weapons of mass destruction on others in the middle east is…….wait for it………Israel in the form of white phosphorous, DIME Missiles and other state of the art weapons supplied by, guess who? America! And Israel has nukes)

"We believe that Iran has the capacity and the delivery capability for nuclear weapons. They can proceed to production. We have got two months to act - before the end of 2009."

"If Iran gained the bomb it would trigger a regional arms race with Saudi and Egypt quickly obtaining weapons," he said. "We would be living next to three Pakistans." (Sorry but, is he serious? The Majority of people in the Middle East are Arabs and Muslims, how do you think they feel living next to a rogue country that hates Arabs and Muslims, makes no excuses for that hatred, has nukes and also has a long track record of attacking Arab nations and stealing their land!)

Mr Sneh believes Iran's regime has been weakened by the pro-democracy uprising in the aftermath of the disputed presidential election. (What he means here is the American covert operation that failed miserably and cost innocent Iranian lives, transcript HERE more proof HERE) It could be brought to its knees by sanctions curtailing imports of petrol, the sale of spare parts for energy production, freezing its banks out of the global monetary system and banning cross-border investment. (Another Gaza) source

So, get ready America, if you think Bush screwed up America, just you wait until Israel is done with you. You'll be penniless as a result of the Billions you give to Israel each year, you'll have your children being killed in not two but THREE wars and possibly more around the world, thanks to your war mongering racist Best Pals (who control you) Israel. And as an added bonus, no one in the world will EVER believe you again when you say you are a "peaceful" country that supports democracy and are not an Anti-Muslim, Anti-Arab, controlled by Israel country. Nuff said!

Clinton's Israeli Handlers May Want Refund

Clinton’s Israeli Handlers may want their money back soon. They are thinking to themselves; “Damn, all that money and she goes and says this";

"We want Iran to calculate what I think is a fair assessment: that if the United States extends a defense umbrella over the region, if we do even more to develop the military capacity of those (allies) in the Gulf, it is unlikely that Iran will be any stronger or safer,"

What they were hoping for and expecting was this statement;

“Go ahead Israel, use your “secret nukes” to Bomb the Shit out of Iran and wipe them off the face of the earth. Don’t worry, we will cover for you as always.”

So, failing an imminent re-education of Clinton by THESE PEOPLE, they may ALL be asking for a full refund soon. Story below:

Israel slams Clinton statement on nuclear Iran

A key minister in the Israeli government criticized U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's statement on Tuesday that Washington would provide "a defense umbrella" for its allies in the Middle East in the event that Iran develops nuclear weapons.

Dan Meridor, Israel's minister for secret services, told Army Radio that the comments imply a willingness to reconcile with the eventuality of a nuclear-armed Iran.

OOOOOOOPS, I should have read further, the "re-education camp" will be taking place soon, see here:

Next Wednesday, a senior U.S. delegation led by National Security Adviser James Jones will arrive in Israel. He will be accompanied by President Barack Obama's special Mideast adviser, Dennis Ross, who recently served as Clinton's special adviser on Iran.

The delegation will also include representatives of the CIA, Defense Department, Treasury and State Department. These officials were invited to Israel by National Security Advisor Uzi Arad, who will lead the Israeli side in what is said to be a continuation of talks held in Washington around three weeks ago.

Like I said........

Israel & Obama Have a Deal, But What?

When ever I hear of Israel “suddenly” deciding to offer a “concession” to Obama, I start to worry immediately and look for the real reason. For instance, why would Israel suddenly be publicizing that they will remove “in one day” 23 settlements? What a great sound-bite, but let’s look deeper. Firstly, it is important to note that these “settlements” are actually small horrid little outposts, like Zionist camping grounds existing on Palestinian land. They are NOT the big shiny impressive ones with lots of settler cockroaches living in big beautiful Israeli built homes over looking the hovels of the former residents of said development. No, we are not talking about “those” settlements.

So, there is something amiss, and, upon reflection, I can some up with a few reasons for Israel’s very “sudden” public decision to remove “in one day” 23 illegal “campgrounds” I mean “settlements.”

Israel never does anything for “right or moral” reasons. Only self gratifying selfish ones that advance the rogue Zionist state’s agendas. So:

1. Either Israel is offering this in the hopes it will satisfy Obama and allow Israel to keep the big settlements.

2. Or worse, it’s a token to give Obama so that Obama can claim some sort of victory on the settlement issue and now start demanding double time movement from HAMAS on accepting Israel as a Jewish state, translation, attempting remove the Right of Return for Palestinians who still have keys in their hands.

3. Or, perhaps it is all part of a trade from Israel to Obama, in order to secure Obama’s blessing for an Israeli strike on Iran. Let us not forget that early on Israel said that any peace deals with Palestine would be linked to progress on what Israel sees as needing to happen to Iran. In other words a military strike. See HERE where they link I/P peace to Obama dealing with Iran. So, if Israel is moving on the issue of Campgrounds, I mean settlements, than what deal has been struck, one wonders...

Either way, it’s a ruse by Israel to get something much bigger than what it offers. That’s the “Zionist Style” of negotiation in a nut shell. here's the story:

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel plans to remove in a single day all 23 unauthorized settler outposts slated for evacuation in the occupied West Bank, a move that would meet a long-standing pledge to Washington, a newspaper said on Tuesday.

The report in Haaretz gave no date for removing the outposts, where some of the most militant settlers in the West Bank live, but said the military held an exercise last week to prepare for their evacuation.

Haaretz, a left-leaning newspaper, said the military was preparing to "forcibly evacuate 23 illegal outposts in one day. The plan was formulated by the security establishment, with the knowledge of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu."

Netanyahu has so far refused to commit to a total freeze, in the most serious rift between Israel and the United States, its main ally, in a decade.

In May, Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilnai said the removal of the outposts, often a cluster of caravans on isolated hilltops built without government authorization, had become a "central issue" for the Netanyahu's administration.

COMMITMENT
The Defense Ministry says it will not reveal the locations of all the outposts to maintain an element of surprise but they include those built after March 2001, a group that Israel committed to remove during the administration of former U.S. president George W. Bush.

The evacuation is expected to be met with resistance from the settlers. Wallerstein said that some 8,000 people live at the outposts.

The Haaretz report was written by one of its most respected columnists, Yoel Marcus, who was also the first to disclose the plans of former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to withdraw soldiers and settlers from the Gaza Strip, a plan that came to fruition in 2005. source

Yeah, some deal has been done with Obama, what that deal is we will soon find out!

CYBER WAR FARE UPDATE

I wrote about this just yesterday, a Mossad agent, a Janes Publishing Group Representative AKA British MI5, and an American CIA agent, discussing the use of Cyber War Fare on Iran's nuclear facilities you can read my post here. Today Presstv is reporting much the same here, minus the links to the three agents:

Israeli intelligence services are trying to sabotage Iran's military and nuclear programs through tainted equipment and cyber attacks, a recent report says.

Israeli officials, weary of Iran's achievements in the nuclear field, have turned to cyber attacks to halt the country's development, Israeli sources told Reuters on Tuesday.

Another method of sabotage mentioned in the report was the use of malware -- a commonly used abbreviation for 'malicious software' -- to "corrupt, commandeer or crash the controls of sensitive sites like uranium enrichment plants".

As Iran's nuclear assets would probably be isolated from outside computers, Israeli agents would have to conceal the malware in software used by the Iranians or discreetly plant it on portable hardware brought in, unknowingly, by technicians.

Last year, Iran arrested 45-year-old Ali Ashtari on charges of relaying sensitive information on military, defense and research centers to intelligence officers working for the infamous Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad.

In a video recorded and later broadcast by IRIB, Ashtari confessed that Mossad had paid him $50,000 to buy internet cables and satellite phones and then sell them on to 'special customers' in the hope of enabling Israel to spy on their communications.

Israeli 'handlers,' whom Ashtari said he met in Thailand, Turkey and Switzerland, allegedly wanted him "to sell these terminals in Iran to special customers so they could hack into this equipment".

CYBER WAR FARE~ May be Used to Attack Iran

Israel-US-British Deadly War Games

UPDATED 8 JULY, the report below is from 7 July, today Presstv is also reporting much the same see my post here after reading the one below:

Well, this just keeps getting more deadly. I’m talking about the Israel-USA-British pact to re-make the Middle East. This just out today; Israel may use Cyber War Fare to attack Iran’s nuclear facility.

This opens up a whole big area of potentially "Whoop-Ass" warfare worry, as the “Un-Holy Group of Three” have the capability to create utter mayhem in the Middle East for centuries to come. If they choose this path, Al Qaeda will become child’s play in contrast to what they will create by continuing to meddle in the affairs of other countries they don’t like. All these groups have already been involved in an attempt to overthrow Iran’s recent elections, I wrote about that here and here where the Obama Plan is to soften the American public up for an attack on Iran.

Back to the Cyber War Fare plan: For instance,using Cyber War Fare they could create a fake missile launch, and then blame Iran to justify an all out Israeli-American attack on Iran. Or they could create some nuclear disaster at Iran’s facility, killing many Iranians. Something like Chernobyl perhaps. Another worrying thing is that not only are US sources being quoted in this article, also British sources from the Janes Publishing Group, AKA MI5, and more here. They are the equivalent of the American CIA. Have a read of these statements below, and then ask yourself if you support the “Change” Obama brings to US foreign Policy.Report below:

The appeal of cyber attacks was boosted, Israeli sources say, by the limited feasibility of conventional air strikes on the distant and fortified Iranian atomic facilities, and by U.S. reluctance to countenance another open war in the Middle East.

"We came to the conclusion that, for our purposes, a key Iranian vulnerability is in its on-line information," said one recently retired Israeli security cabinet member, using a generic term for digital networks. "We have acted accordingly."
Cyberwarfare teams nestle deep within Israel's spy agencies, which have rich experience in traditional sabotage techniques and are cloaked in official secrecy and censorship.

They can draw on the know-how of Israeli commercial firms that are among the world's hi-tech leaders and whose staff are often veterans of elite military intelligence computer units.

"To judge by my interaction with Israeli experts in various international forums, Israel can definitely be assumed to have advanced cyber-attack capabilities," said Scott Borg, director of the U.S. Cyber Consequences Unit, which advises various Washington agencies on cyber security.

Technolytics Institute, an American consultancy, last year rated Israel the sixth-biggest "cyber warfare threat," after China, Russia, Iran, France and "extremist/terrorist groups."

The United States is in the process of setting up a "Cyber Command" to oversee Pentagon operations

Asked to speculate about how Israel might target Iran, Borg said malware -- a commonly used abbreviation for "malicious software" -- could be inserted to corrupt, commandeer or crash the controls of sensitive sites like uranium enrichment plants.

Such attacks could be immediate, he said. Or they might be latent, with the malware loitering unseen and awaiting an external trigger, or pre-set to strike automatically when the infected facility reaches a more critical level of activity.

"Cyberwar has the advantage of being clandestine and deniable,"

"But its effectiveness is hard to gauge, because the targeted network can often conceal the extent of damage or even fake the symptoms of damage. Military strikes, by contrast, have an instantly quantifiable physical effect."
Israel may be open to a more overt strain of cyberwarfare.

Tony Skinner of Jane's Defense Weekly cited Israeli sources as saying that Israel's 2007 bombing of an alleged atomic reactor in Syria was preceded by a cyber attack which neutralized ground radars and anti-aircraft batteries.

"State of War," a 2006 book by New York Times reporter James Risen, recounted a short-lived plan by the CIA and its Israeli counterpart Mossad to fry the power lines of an Iranian nuclear facility using a smuggled electromagnetic-pulse (EMP) device.

A massive, nation-wide EMP attack on Iran could be effected by detonating a nuclear device at atmospheric height.source

So this is the new place for war, at the computer. And not to be outdone, North Korea was behind a recent cyber attack on the USA (gotta give them credit for having the B*lls) read about that here I am reminded of that old Country Joe and the Fish song from Woodstock era. The chorus goes like this:

Five, six, seven, eight
Open up the pearly gates.
Ain't no time to wonder why
Whoopie! We're all going to die.

"DONE DEAL" Iran Will Be Attacked

7-7-09 UPDATED X1 Cyber War Fare may be used against Iran's nuclear plant, see here Original post from 7-6-09 below:

Well, I wrote about Obama's mask slipping, and it seems it is now proven to be true. Read that post for background.

Now, later today we seem to have the confirmation that backs up Biden's remarks, directly from Mossad and the "why" is explained. The "why" is a deal done between Obama on settlements and the Israeli-Palestine conflict in a direct trade for allowing Israel to go forward with it's attack on Iran.

Israel strike threat on Iran back on table

JERUSALEM // A flurry of media reports in Israel and elsewhere, as well as comments by US officials, past and present, have suddenly put the possibility of an Israeli military strike on Iran firmly back on the agenda.

Certainly, the turmoil in Iran after elections that saw the incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad returned under controversial circumstances, has contributed to a firming of the tone by US officials on Iran. This was most notable in an interview Joe Biden, the US vice president, gave ABC News in which he said Israel, as a sovereign nation, would decide for itself how to deal with Iran.

I wrote about the attempts by Israel-USA-Britain to overthrow the Iranian Government, and if that failed what would happen.) article continues:

“One explanation [for Mr Biden’s remarks] is that a deal was done between the US and Israel,” said Yossi Alpher, an Israeli analyst and a former Iran specialist with Mossad, Israel’s foreign intelligence service. “On the same day that Biden made his remarks, Netanyahu opened his cabinet meeting by saying that in the first 100 days of his government, an Israeli consensus had been reached on the two-state solution.”

Mr Alpher said Mr Netanyahu felt that Israel needed to make concessions on the Palestinian issue to secure US support for his government’s position on Iran “if and when” Israel needs to strike Iran.

“It certainly looked like a deal had been done,” he said.

And here's the proof in a 2nd article, check out the "insanely upbeat lovefest" tone of this 2nd report:

Barak: Israel will dismantle outposts within months (In exchange for being allowed to strike Iran)

Mitchell assured by Barak that Israel will dismantle the 23 illegal outposts in space of weeks or months – not years

Seriously, why would Israel even remotely entertain this option of dismantling the settlements all of a sudden like? When they have consistently dug in their heels and continued expansion and ethnic cleansing. Clearly Israel has been offered Iran in exchange for a Palestinain two state solution. And rest assured if Obama is this devious, then the Palestinian deal will truly be a shitty one for Palestine and a great one for Israel. More:

Barak also told Mitchell that Israel expects to see trust-building gestures from Arab states, as well as Palestinian reciprocation for Israeli gestures. Israel is demanding, among other things, that the Palestinians acknowledge a future agreement as an end to the conflict, recognize Israel as the national home of the Jewish people, establish law and order systems, and provide an answer on the status of the Gaza Strip and Hamas. link

Yes, I'd say the "Deal is Done" welcome to war "Obama Style"

ATTACK IRAN~Obama's Mask Slips Off

Anybody ever truly believe Obama was going to be "different?"

UPDATED 7-7-09 it appears that Israel may use Cyber War Fare to attack Iran's nuclear facility, see here Original post from 7-6-09 below:

Israel, England and the US all had parts to play. Israel's job was to keep up the mantra of attacking Iran, so as to scare monger the Iranian population. Israel played the part of "attack dog" Whilst Britain played the part of insider agitator and intelligence gatherers and Obama played the part of being "above the Fray" A part he perfected when running for President during the primaries. It was never Obama on the attack only his supporters, followers and surrogates, whilst enabling Obama to keep his hands clean. It was always his surrogates. Same tactic being employed right now. keep reading..

Biden says Israel has the right to attack Iran

The U.S. wouldn't interfere with a sovereign nation's actions, he says, even as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff says such an attack would be destabilizing.

Biden's remarks suggested a tougher U.S. stance against Iran's nuclear ambitions, but administration officials denied that. Instead, White House officials said, his televised remarks Sunday simply reflected the U.S. view that Israel had a right to defend itself and make its own decisions on national security.

So does that right to defend one,s country also extend to every other country in the world? What about Palestine? I digress...So, Shall we compare today's comments from Biden (Obama's Sock Puppet) to this report from April 2009, a mere 2 months ago. but.... (Before the Iranian Elections mind you):

APRIL 2009 As Israel and the US continue on a collision course over Iran, Tel Aviv says it hopes to put an end to Iran's nuclear activities with a "heroic operation".

Ever since President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and President Barack Obama signalled willingness for direct talks between the United States and Iran in an effort to end thirty years of diplomatic hostility, Tel Aviv and Washington have edged toward having a falling-out.

According to the report, the Obama White House is mulling over whether to impose sanctions on Tel Aviv should Israel go ahead with a unilateral attack on Iran.

Wowzer, so America feels so strongly in April 2009 about not allowing Isra-Hell to make a unilateral strike on Iran that the US would EVEN consider "sanctions" against Tel Aviv? Yeah, right LOL. The reality is that Obama is running his foreign policy just like he ran his presidential campaign. He's remaining "above" the fray, as always, appearing "God-Like" Whilst all the while his "POSSE" works behind the scenes doing all the things Obama could not get away with overtly. AS that would only spoil the image he has created of himself. No, the deal is Obama has to keep this appearance of being the "Great Hope" of the world. It's all smoke and mirrors, but mostly mirrors. Like the mirror Obama stands in front of every day, telling himself no one is the wiser...........

The sad fact is that in the build up to the Iranian elections the Obama Administration was all about "talking to Iran's Ahmadinejad" all about improving US image, all about "making ties." When in fact, the US had another plan all along. Use Israel to keep the scare tactics up on a possible Iran attack by Israel, and at the same time Obama extends the hand of friendship. Then come the elections, now we will see if the US/Israel/Britain plan will work or not.

Prior to the election funds and covert support were funnelled into Iran's Progressive movement by the US; and Britain assisted with media support using Britain's newly created BBC Persian Channel inside Iran. Iran knows how Britain works perfectly, so do the people of Ireland.

Iran accused Britain of instigating protests, arrested some of its embassy workers and expelled a British Broadcasting Corporation correspondent.

Rosemary Hollis, who teaches Middle East politics at City University London, says Iranian rhetoric about Britain is rooted in a long-held perception that while the United States might be more powerful, Britain is more devious. "The perception is, and you get this across the Middle East, that the Americans are at least straightforward, even if you resent what they're doing. They pretty much come in the front door. But the British pop in the window and nip out the back door," she said.

This is 100% true!more...

Britain has a long history of deep involvement in not only Iran, but across the Middle East during the past 200 years. The 1979 Iranian Revolution focused on the United States because of its long-time support of Iran's Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlevi. But Hollis says Iranian conspiracy theories have always seen Britain as the key supporting player, or even as the grand covert manipulator.

"I think it's only been since the Iranian Revolution that the United States has been the 'Great Satan.'

Analysts say that Iran was particularly incensed about the new British Broadcasting Corporation's Persian language TV station that was started early this year.

Alex Vatanka, a senior Middle East analyst for the Britain-based Jane's Publishing Group, says that compounded official anger about Western broadcasts to Iran when it was already the target of broadcasts by Voice of America's own Persian News Network link

Did ya get that last sentence there? Alex Vatanka has been involved in Iranian affairs since before the Iranian elections. Here's a wee snippet from June 12th regarding a missile test in Iran (taken from an Intelligence site no less) :

" the announcement that there was a deadline by the U.S. may have been received in Tehran as a slap in the face," said Alex Vatanka, a senior Middle East analyst at Janes information Group, particularly coming after Iran's release last week of a American journalist who was jailed for spying.

He called the launch a gift to Ahmadinejad from military hard-liners who hoped that it would demonstrate the country's strength and help boost the President's poll numbers before the June 12th election.

Well, so what? They are merely countering all the covert meddling by US and British intelligence people and groups, like Alex Vatanka and the Intelligence Gathering group he works for (Jane's Publishing Group) a covert intelligence military group, who say this:

Jane’s continues to push the boundaries in open source intelligence gathering, reporting and analysis. Our solutions offer the breadth, depth, accuracy and reach to meet a broad range of needs.

And this:

Intelligence Solutions
Whether your focus is equipment, forces, organisations, business, markets or geopolitics, Jane’s is the authoritative source. No other organisation offers a comparable breadth of coverage or depth of proven expertise. That’s why Jane’s is trusted by clients from more than 180 countries worldwide to provide the latest news and most penetrating analysis.

And of course there is this as well:

Consultancy
Jane’s Strategic Advisory Services (JSAS) provides strategic consulting services to governments and businesses. Use us to carry out detailed, specialist research into key areas of concern, and to prepare reports to feed into your strategic planning process. (Like overthrowing Iran's government perhaps?????) Jane’s unrivalled resources and experience can help you develop and implement a successful strategy. source

And people wonder why Iran is pissed off?

The social media networks were part and parcel of this plan as well, they were to be used the same way Obama's people used them during his campaign. Social media like YouTube, twitter and Facebook to push the mentra of "revolution". And rile up the American public to soften them up for Obama's REAL plan of allowing Israel to attack Iran. Because as we all learned during Obama's run for POTUS, whatever the influential blogs are talking about, soon you see the same thing being covered at MSNBC and CNN and the slew of newspaper outlets who support Obama will soon follow suit with the same coverage as well. All to amplify the effect of "revolution" and to demonize the Iranian election. Soon the American public will be begging Obama to "act" with their permission,that's the plan Obama is smarter than Bush was; Obama knows he must have huge American support to attack another country after what Bush did. So Obama will create the "facts on the ground" that will then get the Great American Public on his side. Yes, soon the American public will be softened up enough to look the other way whilst Israel attacks Iran and destabilises the entire Middle East. Yippee!

Britain used it's BBC Persian news channel to fan the flames of unrest, to question, to place doubt and to spread the mantra of corruption and that the majority of people were against Ahmadinejad. Which is probably not true in the least as he had massive support from the non-academics and less educated Iranians, who, do outnumber the reformists. This is why many of the British reporters have been expelled as well as their embassy staff, which assisted and participated in protests.

Obama never intended to extend a hand to Ahmadinejad, never intended to open the door to friendship and heal old wounds with Iran. Otherwise we'd not be seeing this from Obama now that his "Plan" to overthrow the Islamic Republic failed miserably:

US President Barack Obama pledged during his election campaign to open dialogue with Tehran, but the violent crackdown on Iranian protesters angered by a disputed presidential election appear to have put that plan on hold. link

What a great plan by Obama, if he can get the Reformists elected by creating a "colourful" revolution using protests, US funding and social media, Israel and Britan, to organise and overthrow the Government, then of course he carries on with extending that "hand" of friendship. But, the plan failed and now he uses the Iranian crackdown on massive protests to withdraw the formerly "extended" hand of friendship.

One thing that cannot be reconciled in this plan, is if Obama was willing to talk to Ahmadinejad "without preconditions" as he stated all throughout Obama's primary debates with Hillary Clinton (remember one of the first debates where he said this?) And now that Obama was elected he has also continued to say this as well, until the election failure, that is. So, why would he be willing to talk to Ahmadinejad in 2008 when he was running for POTUS when Ahmadinejad was doing all sorts of things that were troubling to America, yet now all that has happened is that Ahmadinejad was re-elected, and suddenly Obama won't talk to him. That's the "tell"

And don't forget Israel can't attack without help from America, just look at this map if you doubt that. Israel will need to fly into Iraq for re-fuelling or at the very least fly over Iraqi arispace, and just who controls that? Why it's the US of A.

Will America NEVER learn?

ISRAEL PREPS TO ATTACK IRAN WITH NUKES

Egypt helps Israel prepare to attack Iran
Free Palestine Writers



Just look at how BIG Israel is now. They've effectively taken over Egypt. Yes, Egypt is becoming "Little" or should I say "Big" Israel these days. Blocking aid for fellow Arabs in Palestine by allowing Israel to control Egypts borders, and now they have handed over their waters to the Israeli army's super duper new Nuclear Submarine, which is now stationed in an area to attack Iran, thanks to the former country called Egypt, which is now part of Israel. What ever happened to the great Arab Nation?
Shame on Egypt.

The Dolphin-class attack submarine is reported to be the first Israeli naval vessel to transit the Suez Canal in four years on its way from Haifa to Eilat last month. According to DEBKAfile's military sources, the move indicates a strengthening of the informal Israel-Egyptian-Saudi pact forged in recent months against Iran and first revealed by our sources. The three Middle East nations have opted for an Iran policy which is separate from the track pursued by US president Barack Obama.

According to foreign military sources, the Israeli Dolphins are stationed in the Mediterranean, the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean opposite Iran's shores. They are said to be armed with torpedo tubes capable of launching nuclear-capable cruise missiles.

To transit the Suez Canal, the armed submarine would have required Egyptian permission at the highest level, possibly even President Hosni Mubarak. An official in Cairo told Reuters that its passage would not be problematic as Egypt and Israel are not at war.

This noncommittal response indicates that Egypt has no objection to Israeli military craft passing through the canal on their way to the Red Sea and on to the Persian Gulf in case of a decision to strike Iran. The alternative would be a voyage of weeks around the Horn of Africa.

Our military sources report that since the Israel Navy lost the Dakar submarine near Greece in 1968, all Israeli subs are armed when they move out of harbor. Disclosure of the Israeli sub's passage through the Suez Canal last month is rated by our sources as of high regional significance, over and above the Middle East diplomatic moves afoot. source

http://irish4palestine.blogspot.com